Chinese Language Curriculum and Pedagogy Review Committee (CLCPRC)

The Committee was set up in February 2004 to articulate the objectives and target groups of the various Chinese Language (CL) syllabuses, and to review the structure, curriculum content, pedagogy and assessment methods used in CL teaching and learning today.
[ back to article ]



Integrated Programme (IP)

The Integrated Programme was one of the key recommendations of the Junior College/Upper Secondary Education Review Committee, appointed in April 2002 to develop a revised JC curriculum and framework, and to set out a vision for the JC/Upper Secondary education system.

The Integrated Programme would cater to students who are clearly university-bound and could do well in a less structured environment. It would free up time used to prepare students for the 'O' level examinations to engage in broader learning experiences. The Committee therefore recommended that some schools which are ready should offer an Integrated Programme that provides a seamless upper secondary and JC education where secondary students can proceed to JC without the need to take the 'O' level examinations.

As of 2005, the Raffles family and Hwa Chong family of schools Anglo-Chinese School (Independent), Dunman High School, National Junior College, Victoria Junior College and Temasek Junior College will be offering the IP.
[ back to article ]



Specialised Independent Schools

Specialised Independent Schools are part of the recommendations made by the Junior College/Upper Secondary Education Review Committee (see ‘Integrated Programme’). They cater to students with talents in specific fields, e.g. the arts, sports, mathematics and science.

Such schools can better develop the special abilities of highly talented children than mainstream schools by offering a customised curriculum. These schools will add to the vibrancy of the national school system. Currently, Specialised Independent Schools include Singapore Sports School, NUS High School of Math and Science which starts in 2005, and Specialised School for the Arts, slated to start in 2007.
[ back to article ]



Privately-Funded Schools

On 13 August 2003, MOE invited proposals to set up privately-funded schools. The setting up of 2-3 privately-funded schools at the secondary or junior college (JC) level introduces greater diversity in the education landscape and offers greater choice for our students.

Privately-funded schools will be required to provide a Singaporean environment as well as adhere to MOE’s bilingual policy and incorporate National Education (NE) into their curriculum. It is envisaged that Singaporeans/Permanent Residents will comprise at least 50% of privately-funded school enrolment. On 12 April 04, MOE approved two privately-funded schools, namely Anglo-Chinese School (International) and Hwa Chong International.
[ back to article ]



Teacher Work Attachment (TWA)

At the 2003 Workplan Seminar, then Acting Education Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam announced that MOE would be giving teachers more avenues to gain experiences outside school.

The Teacher Work Attachment pilot started in Nov – Dec 2003, with 28 organisations offering attachment opportunities for 72 teachers. During the school holidays in 2004, a total of 223 teachers were involved with over 50 organisations on the TWA.
[ back to article ]



University Autonomy Governance and Funding Review (UAGF)

At the Committee of Supply Debate in March last year, Minister for Education, Mr Tharman Shanmugaratam announced that MOE would re-examine the relationship between Government and the universities to see how we can provide the universities with greater institutional autonomy in future.

Subsequently, in April last year, following a study visit with DPM Tan to the US to learn more about US universities’ governance structures and the levels of autonomy that they enjoyed, Minister Tharman announced the setting up of a Steering Committee to undertake a review of university autonomy, governance and funding.

The Steering Committee was tasked to recommend an appropriate model of autonomy for the three local universities, NUS, NTU and SMU, which would allow them to respond more nimbly to the opportunities and challenges they face in an increasingly competitive global university landscape.
[ back to article ]

Printer-friendly page